Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
Telnet has worse security than even a buggy miserably fake ssh.
Telnet has _no_ security. It doesn't have fake security, which you
get by using crappy random bits and Open SSH. That is a huge
difference. Open SSH was designed for security, telnet was _not_.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: Budi Rahardjo <budi@research.indocisc.com>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: pancake <sergipop@mx3.redestb.es>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: neal@cs.uml.edu (Neal H. Walfield)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)