Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:
> > Why do I feel like repeating this old mantra: Bad security is worse
> > than no security.
>
> Sez you. Many disagree. Especially for a system in development, with
> already has bad security.
>
> Fine, would you like to work on this? Or do you purpose to worse the
> already bad security?
Telnet has worse security than even a buggy miserably fake ssh.
This seems like a case of the best being an enemy of the barely
workable.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: K1 images - final report?
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: Budi Rahardjo <budi@research.indocisc.com>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: pancake <sergipop@mx3.redestb.es>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: neal@cs.uml.edu (Neal H. Walfield)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: kilobug@freesurf.fr (Gaël Le Mignot)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>