Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
>> "BN" == Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> writes:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 20:21, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
>> > I fail to see why you would go against the will of every developer
>> > (debian and upstream) on this list.
>>
>> Read my previous e-mail *sawfish 1 is exacltly the same as sawfis 2*
>>
>> Then we don't need to maintains 2 sawfish packages.
> How about gnome-terminal ?
Same. gnome-terminal 2 is really better than 1.4.
BTW, I've seen my 1.4 bugs forwarded to upstream tagged 2.0 some months
ago, and now tagged 2.2...
Then I think we should wait for GNOME 3.xx
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: