Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:24:22AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <steven.robbins@videotron.ca> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Indeed, there need be NO extra work for the Debian Gnome2 maintainers.
> > Orphan the Gnome1 components you don't want to maintain, and someone
> > will pick them up. I am willing, for example, maintain the G1 version
> > of gnome-terminal and sawfish-related stuff.
>
> I continue to maintains gnome-core 1.4 where gnome-terminal is.
That does not change the fact that the gnome-terminal package has
been switch from 1.x to 2.x. See packages.debian.org/gnome-terminal.
> And FYI
> the core sawfish code is exactly the same in sawfish 1 and sawfish 2,
> then I don't see any good reason to package sawfish twice.
Perhaps, but they are linked with completely different sets of
libraries.
Please upload gnome-terminal2 and sawfish2 and let someone who is
willing, maintain the G1 versions.
Thanks,
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: