Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
<quote who="Christian Marillat">
> > How about gnome-terminal ?
>
> Same. gnome-terminal 2 is really better than 1.4.
Holy cow.
That _doesn't_matter_! gnome-terminal 2 doesn't integrate into the dominant
GNOME desktop on sid user's machines at all. That alone is a major bug in
GNOME integration on sid. A *bug*. Bleeding-edge or not, no other
distribution would make an engineering, usability, stability or integration
choice like this one.
It is a *dumb thing to do*.
Let users choose to upgrade to GNOME 2 components, please. Doing it
piecemeal is a horrible, horrible way to be handling this, for all of the
reasons I (and others) have outlined before.
> BTW, I've seen my 1.4 bugs forwarded to upstream tagged 2.0 some months
> ago, and now tagged 2.2...
These are mostly due to libzvt, which will be replaced in GNOME 2.2.
- Jeff
--
... *bounce*bounce*bounce*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: