Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
>> "JW" == Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org> writes:
[...]
> Both of those are things that need to be addressed as soon as possible.
> Replacing G1D components with G2D components piecemeal is foolish, and I
> have no idea why Christian is taking this approach.
Because gnome-terminal 2 is better than the 1.4 version and I can't
maintains two sawfish versions.
If I want to package two sawfishs, then I need to maintains two
rep-gtk versions (0.15 and 0.16), who conflicts each other because
sawfish always find the 0.15 version and the build for sawfish 2 will
fail. Then for building sawfish for gtk 1.2 I need to remove sawfish 2.0
and rep-gtk 0.15 package and vice versa, not really realistic.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: