Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
On 9 Jul 2002, Christian Marillat wrote:
> From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
> Subject: Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?
>
> >> "BN" == Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 20:21, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > I fail to see why you would go against the will of every developer
> >> > (debian and upstream) on this list.
> >>
> >> Read my previous e-mail *sawfish 1 is exacltly the same as sawfis 2*
> >>
> >> Then we don't need to maintains 2 sawfish packages.
>
> > How about gnome-terminal ?
>
> Same. gnome-terminal 2 is really better than 1.4.
But you pull in a lot of the GNOME 2 libs which may not be desirable at
all.
Kind regards,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: