Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:39:02 +0000, Neil Williams
>On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:07:56 +0100
>Marc Haber <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> >Amen. I'm much happier how the last couple of releases were handled.
>> >The release team(s) did an outstanding job.
>> >And things like autoremovals are a god send.
>> I am not opposed to autoremovals. I am opposed to removing packages
>> and not letting them back in after the bugs were fixed just because we
>> can. We have never done this, and we shold not do that for stretch.
>That is just an untruth, sorry.
>At some point before the end of every freeze for every release, we have
>*always* done this. It is inevitable. It may be (and preferably will
>be) a short period at the very end of the freeze.
Of course. What I have understood is that this will be general freeze
policy from the beginning for stretch. I might have misunderstood in
the talk, and I didn't find a general freeze policy document to read
up on this yet.
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834