Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:57:23PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> I think I'm of the "it's a low-level tool, you can shoot yourself in
> the foot if you insist on it" school.
Then the problem is source packages force you to use this low level too.
That's why I said I will never install a package with dpkg, but only
with apt.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Cameron Hutchison <camh+dl@xdna.net>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: Vincent Ho <loki@internode.on.net>
- Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
- From: "Michael K. Edwards" <m.k.edwards@gmail.com>