[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?

On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 01:58 -0500, William Ballard wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:53:57AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 01:35 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:16:01AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > dpkg doesn't remove foo-modules_1.0 at all.
> > > 
> > Note that I said "remove", the old files are replaced during the unpack
> > phase rather than removed.
> In what sense is banana/foo 1.0 "not removed" ?
It is not removed.

Removed, it is not.

Not removed, it is.

Yoda that any way you like.

At no point does dpkg go through the file list of the previous version
and remove the files.

At no point during the upgrade are you in a state without files of
either version on the disk.

The files are not removed.

> As to the rest of your post -- reread this thread more carefully.
I have, I'm obviously missing your point.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: