[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?

On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:15 +1100, Cameron Hutchison wrote:

> dpkg first removes foo-modules_1.0
> dpkg then check dependencies of foo-modules_2.0
> dpkg complains that foo-utils is not installed and aborts the
> installation of foo-modules_2.0
This is incorrect.

dpkg doesn't remove foo-modules_1.0 at all.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: