Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:16:01AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> dpkg doesn't remove foo-modules_1.0 at all.
I used equivs to make a package "foo", version 1.0, and installed it.
I used equivs to make a package "foo", version 2.0, which depend on
"bar", which doesn't exist. Tried to install it with dpkg -i.
foo (2.0) unstable; urgency=low
It looks to me like the files for "foo version 1.0" have been
clobbered, at least in /usr/share/doc/foo/
Where are the unpacked files for foo 2.0 kept where they
are not clobbering the foo 1.0 files?