Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:53:57AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 01:35 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:16:01AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > dpkg doesn't remove foo-modules_1.0 at all.
> Note that I said "remove", the old files are replaced during the unpack
> phase rather than removed.
In what sense is banana/foo 1.0 "not removed" ?
As to the rest of your post -- reread this thread more carefully.