Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my
> theory:
>
> you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the list
>
> someone (Mr-Broken) with broken mailer uses reply-to-all which CCs you
> anyway ignoring M-F-To.
>
> mutt user uses list-reply to Mr-Broken's post, mutt sees you were CCed
> and assumes you should be included since there is no M-F-To header.
> mutt then sets the M-F-To header to include you for the benifit of
> later list-replies.
How about having the mailing list software add M-F-To headers to mails
that do not have it and do not have Reply-To, filling it with the
mailing list only? Might help at least some of the cases.
- Adi Stav
Reply to: