Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
Date: 03 Jan 2001 19:31:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 873df04hdw.fsf@hacking.dk>
In-reply-to: Riku Voipio's message of "Wed, 3 Jan 2001 20:22:16 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 5.0.0.25.2.20010102224955.00a53470@130.74.162.251> <[🔎] slime-924112f4fd2fe1eb4e75c0bc18e939b5@liw.wapit.com> <[🔎] 20010103202216.A32321@ukkosenjyly.mine.nu>

Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> writes:

> Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> 
>  reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Please read "``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful" <URL:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>

It should say it all.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
  - From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>

References:
- Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
  - From: Chris Lawrence <cnlawren@olemiss.edu>
- Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi>
- Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]
Previous by thread: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
Next by thread: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread