[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)

On 30/09/01, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 06:56:00PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Debian with manual chroot bind == bad.
> > > Other distribution with manual chroot bind == okay.
> > Idiot. Sorry, but where exactly did I write that? If you are not able to
> Just a few messages back, you said:
> > for this purpose. So instead of sending in a patch, I would stop
> > installing debian on any machine that should be a nameserver and switch
> > to an os, where either I get a chrooted bind by default or directly can
> > build a chroot manually.
> You implied that you couldn't build a manual chroot for bind on Debian.

May I ask why you oversee the last part of the sentence you were
quoting? There I stated "directly can build a chroot manually.". So
there I sayed, that I'm able to manual create a bind chroot if I need
that. So the assumption above made by Steve is wrong, because it doesn't
take my whole statements into account.

           Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16  63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853

Attachment: pgpgbmVrvLWKq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: