On 30/09/01, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 06:56:00PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Debian with manual chroot bind == bad. > > > Other distribution with manual chroot bind == okay. > > Idiot. Sorry, but where exactly did I write that? If you are not able to > Just a few messages back, you said: > > for this purpose. So instead of sending in a patch, I would stop > > installing debian on any machine that should be a nameserver and switch > > to an os, where either I get a chrooted bind by default or directly can > > build a chroot manually. > You implied that you couldn't build a manual chroot for bind on Debian. May I ask why you oversee the last part of the sentence you were quoting? There I stated "directly can build a chroot manually.". So there I sayed, that I'm able to manual create a bind chroot if I need that. So the assumption above made by Steve is wrong, because it doesn't take my whole statements into account. Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpgbmVrvLWKq.pgp
Description: PGP signature