Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)
On 29-Sep-01, 05:37 (CDT), Christian Kurz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> No. If the bind debian package will only support chroot by using mount
> --bind, I will not send in a patch. Especially since like previously
> stated in this discussion it's fairly easy to chroot bind this days and
> I don't see any need for depending on kernel 2.4.x features like 2.4.x
> for this purpose. So instead of sending in a patch, I would stop
> installing debian on any machine that should be a nameserver and switch
> to an os, where either I get a chrooted bind by default or directly can
> build a chroot manually.
Are you still claiming that you *can't* build a manual chroot bind starting
with Debian's bind package? Or are saying:
Debian with manual chroot bind == bad.
Other distribution with manual chroot bind == okay.
Either way, you are a troll.
Steve Greenland <email@example.com>