Phil Morrell <debian@emorrp1.name> writes: > Just be aware that this rationale can have the opposite of its intended > effect in the long term: > > https://ariadne.space/2022/01/22/the-fsfs-relationship-with-firmware-is-harmful-to-free-software-users/ My reading of that is that the FSF RYF program does not meet the needs of people who do not care about having a fully free software system. I don't see how that is unexpected. > I find that if I assume the DSC points are unordered, and numbered only > for reference, then there's sentences in there that support the offering > of official images including firmware by default, even while considering > the iso as a Debian component. Interesting, can you explain quoting the text supporting that? /Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature