On Friday 17 October 2014 06:27 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice.Please do not conflate two very different issues. The default choice has been decided and is not in question at this point. This is about ensuring that SysV init (among others) is and continues to be a *possible* choice for a user.
It would be nice to know what "possible" is defined as.
-- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
Description: OpenPGP digital signature