[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Friday 17 October 2014 06:27 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com> wrote:
> Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well
> for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice.
Please do not conflate two very different issues. The default choice
has been decided and is not in question at this point. This is about
ensuring that SysV init (among others) is and continues to be a
*possible* choice for a user.

It would be nice to know what "possible" is defined as.

Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: