On 17/10/14 at 13:59 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 17/10/14 at 11:38 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > For the jessie release, all software that currently supports being run > > > > under sysvinit should continue to support sysvinit unless there is no > > > > technically feasible way to do so. > > > > > > I believe "currently" needs to be clarified - are you talking about the > > > current state of jessie, of wheezy, or something else? > > > > I tried to keep changes from the original text (as voted on by the TC) > > to the bare minimum. > > But, since the intend here is to allow swift upgrades between stable > > releases, it should read: > > > > For the jessie release, all software available in Debian 'wheezy' that > > supports being run under sysvinit should continue to support sysvinit > > unless there is no technically feasible way to do so. > > > > Hi Lucas, > > For clarity, are you formally amending your own text here? Yes. I am expecting other fine-tunings during the next hours/days, so I initially wanted to gather those changes in a single amended version. But now that you asked the question, yes, please amend the proposal with the above change. Thanks, Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature