[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems


On Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Speaking for no-one other than myself, I _am_ very unhappy that given
> how long the discussion has been rumbling on for, and how much
> opportunity there has been, that anyone thought that two weeks before
> the freeze (which has had a fixed date for nearly a year now) was the
> right time to raise this.


And for what exactly? Gnome right now is installable with systemd-shim + 
sysvinit, why can't this GR wait until after release when the dust has 

This is a GR based on rumors, which is very sad.

And even sadder, what the GR states: "we think this software is not we like it 
to be. And/but we force *you* to change it - whether *you* think it's sensible 
or not." That's childish, to say at best :(

If you don't like upstreams choices, *you* should write patches. Not GRs 
telling other people to do so.

	Holger, thinking about how a sensible GR to counter this one could be 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: