Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD voting methodsGR
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of
> some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with
> the information I need to make an informed decision. After all they
> are trying to convince me to support their option. If they do not,
> and I care about the issue, I may well vote and rank additional
> discussion above all options.
That's my feelings exactly. I never felt that information was provided,
so I voted for further discussion.
On a related note, I'm a little bothered about the result. Obviously
144:16 was a win. But only 160 people voted, at most 20% of developers and
probably more like 15%. And voted to change the constitution at that.
And according to the secretary's announcement, only 42.53 votes were
required, or 5%! Still, that's what the constitution says.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>