Re: SANE default scanner
On Wed 29 Jul 2020 at 12:07:08 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > If the patch is to be rejected, or just ignored, then my time would be
> > better invested in an external work-around, it would be less effort than
> > forking, and more convenient.
>
> I'd just ask them. I.e. explicit is better than implicit.
>
> If you need a second pair of eyes to look over your patch, I'm ready. I
> can read C.
Reviewing a patch for a non-extisting bug? That's above and beyond the
call of duty :).
--
Brian.
Reply to: