[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Emacs and loss of highlighting: problem semi-solved (Buster MATE)



On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 28 ian 20, 09:59:44, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:54:47PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > 
> > >  As that package apparently is required for the Mate desktop, it's
> > > likely that to resolve this that you'll need to comment the lines in
> > > that file as root and note that package upgrades may overwrite your
> > > commented file with the one supplied with the package.
> > 
> > This would be a Debian policy violation. /etc is taboo, sysadmin
> > overrides (you get asked at upgrade, though, so some vigilance is
> > in order).
> 
> It seems to me you are conflating dpkg conffiles[1] with files in /etc.
> 
> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-conffiles.html

Yep, but this [2] /strongly/ suggests that conffiles are exactly those
living under /etc.

Cheers
[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#conffiles

-- tomás

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: