Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with tentacles.
> > (Do cancers actually have tentacles??).
> It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is. Read Lennart's own blog
> if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down.
> I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not
> optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not
> have systemd. Not that I would support any version with systemd, but
> some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort.
> > I gather Devuan is doing well. So there are choices. One of course is stick
> > with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such
> > distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
> And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto. Renaming is just hiding
> the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.
Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.
>From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd.
A fair fight is the result of poor planning.