Re: Moderated posts?
On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 07:42:58 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 13/10/2014 5:48 AM, Brian wrote:
> > Not a single one of these people have a *genuine* problem with systemd
> > on Debian. The first port of call for genuine problems with systemd is
> > the mailing list at pkg-systemd-maintainers.lists.alioth.debian.org.
> >
> > They do not post there.
>
> Look here, look much harder, because you seem to have blinkers on.
Although I didn't emphasise it my emphasis was on "genuine". Genuine
problems for Debian are anything which will affect Jessie; it is the
only thing which matters. Such problems should be reported to the BTS.
You don't think I've seen the 1,000+ posts here? Very few of them
describe any genuine problem with systemd in Debian.
> >> initially thought, what the heck, why should I worry about this at all
> >> - -- I just though, well systemd is a forgone conclusion, why all the
> >> whingers? But as I said, I read more closely and widely and realized
> >> that the whingers were doing Debian a real service and not the other way
> >> around.
> >
> > Your initial gut feeling was correct; they are whingers.
>
> No. There are very serious problems with the change for all sorts of
> reasons for all sorts of users. Even in terms of upgrades and ongoing
> use of production systems, that alone is significant.
Anybody would have to be specific about these serious problems and
report them to the BTS for action to be taken. Generalities stay on
-user and languish.
> > I've snipped the rest because it appears to be a rehash of part of the
> > Rebellion manifesto.
>
> You mean, the anti-rebellion?
No.
Reply to: