Re: Sid Systemd upgrade
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12:37AM CEST, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> said:
> On 7/22/14, Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:19:54PM CEST, Andrei POPESCU
> > <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> said:
> >> On Lu, 21 iul 14, 21:54:48, Erwan David wrote:
> >> > Le 21/07/2014 21:33, Joe a écrit :
> >> > > Let us hope so. Tonight's upgrade to sid requires the removal of
> >> > > sysvinit-core...
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > libpam-systemd 204 depends systemd-sysv|systemd-shim
> >> > libpam-systemd 208 depends systemd-sysv
> >> >
> >> > Alternative disappeared (and systemd-sysv conflicts sysvinit-core)
> >> >
> >> > But thta's in testing...
> >>
> >> You might want to wait a little longer:
> >> https://lists.debian.org/87mwc9gfsw.fsf@xoog.err.no
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Andrie
> >
> > I know. I would be more trustful if there was a dependency in the form
> > systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (> 6.3) rather than the plain disapearance
> > of systemd-dhim, which means that not onbly must we wait for the new
> > systemd-shim to appear, but also for a new libpam-systemd package to
> > appear.
> >
> > And I have big doubts about the fact that systemd developpers will
> > produce a new package with only difference a changed depends clause.
>
> Just as well you don't have time to test 'testing', otherwise we might
> think you were wanting to use 'testing' in production :)
I test parts of it, I but I cannot test all of it and especially NOT the base system.
Reply to: