[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sid Systemd upgrade



On 7/22/14, Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:19:54PM CEST, Andrei POPESCU
> <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> said:
>> On Lu, 21 iul 14, 21:54:48, Erwan David wrote:
>> > Le 21/07/2014 21:33, Joe a écrit :
>> > > Let us hope so. Tonight's upgrade to sid requires the removal of
>> > > sysvinit-core...
>> > >
>> >
>> > libpam-systemd 204 depends systemd-sysv|systemd-shim
>> > libpam-systemd 208 depends systemd-sysv
>> >
>> > Alternative disappeared (and systemd-sysv conflicts sysvinit-core)
>> >
>> > But thta's in testing...
>>
>> You might want to wait a little longer:
>> https://lists.debian.org/87mwc9gfsw.fsf@xoog.err.no
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andrie
>
> I know. I would be more trustful if there was a dependency in the form
> systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (> 6.3) rather than the plain disapearance
> of systemd-dhim, which means that not onbly must we wait for the new
> systemd-shim to appear, but also for a new libpam-systemd package to
> appear.
>
> And I have big doubts about the fact that systemd developpers will
> produce a new package with only difference a changed depends clause.

Just as well you don't have time to test 'testing', otherwise we might
think you were wanting to use 'testing' in production :)


Reply to: