Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:38 +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
> > Or think about machines in mills, sorting out single grains of poor
> > quality while they are falling down like a waterfall into the
> > millstone granting a better flour quality than you can with dozens of
> > human workers doing the same.
>
> I mentioned that there are some tasks computers are good for ;), but
> many things only can be done by humans.
What is quality? Quality means different things to different people. The
supermarket would discard the average apple while the so called
"organic" store would see it as just another healthy apple!
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to:
- References:
- sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Jarth Berilcosm <jarth@yahoo.com>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Jarth Berilcosm <jarth@yahoo.com>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Robert Brockway <robert@timetraveller.org>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Iain M Conochie <iain@thargoid.co.uk>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Denis Witt <denis.witt@concepts-and-training.de>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>