Hi, Dňa Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:40:16 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> napísal: > On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 18:22 +0200, Slavko wrote: > > But i am surprised by the small amount of responses too. Nobody > > takes care about this? Or people afraid already? > > If I would have secret data on my computer that is connected to the > Internet, I wouldn't make much noise in the Internet. This is often made mistake. I don't write about heavy secret business/military sensitive information. I write about normal thing, for which people have curtain on windows, doors on houses. Or things, which we are talking whisper (translation?). Or you have no one from this? You never whisper? You have no own secrets? I was more than 20 years in our army, where every phone has panel with text: "Attention! The enemy listen!" :-) I have no problem to protect my sensitive data then. But question is if the word have to tolerate these activities. > Here it's not allowed to hold a letter for your neighbours against the > light and read it. It's not allowed to open the letter etc., but we > are aware that some people open the letters or hold them against the > light. You wrote in some early message, that emails are as postcards. You are right. I will repeat you: + SMTP/POP/IMAP = postcard + SSL/STARTLS = letters in envelope Is normal in your country, that the postal office is opening all envelopes and inspecting all letters? Is normal in your country, that the postal office uses information from you correspondence to its own business? In our country it is a criminal act and i believe, that in other EU countries too. If someone reads letters against light, it is criminal too (i don't know how these our terms translate into English). Because to have the privacy is the human right and since our law doesn't prevent this, there is some satisfaction by sanctions after detection (and these sanctions are prevention too)! Where are sanctions on the Internet? USA protects word against terrorists, but who protect word against USA? > Here it's not allowed to steal a car, but if you leave the key in the > lock and go away and somebody does steal your car, it's considered as > contributory fault. Yes, and how many people consider stealing the car as normal and not as criminal? Don't matter where the car's keys are. Are we still talking about decent people? Decent people will not take car, nor without keys, nor with keys. It will not break into nothing from others. Only criminals nad stupids will do this. Yes, i can think, that i am something extra, because i am not leaving keys int the car. I can think, that is stupid who leave keys in car. But it is really right? I was some times in situation, where i had casualty people in (or near the) car - thereby i don't take care about car's keys, but how quickly provide (or get) help for them only... Don't forget: Who is tolerating evil behavior, is participating on it... regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature