Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/26/07 09:00, Steve Lamb wrote:
[snip]
>
> But does not fit the requirement of easily converted to an acceptable
> format or being able to work visually with it. No, I am not counting LyX and
> the like because to suggest a WYSIWYG editor for LaTeX who's stringent
> proponents eschew WYSIWYG is to put oneself right back at the same level as
> any other tool.
You're saying that only stringent proponents get to define the usage
parameters of a system.
Highly invalid logic. The kind I'd expect from political activists.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG+o6kS9HxQb37XmcRAsQOAKCMeS1VrglmSMNG+p9EuIF3BElp/QCfYUpC
1rcdLRW1Bjkk8i5egI9iqEk=
=/oAE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: