Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?

To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
From: Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:14:02 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 429360DA.5060007@ultrasw.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 428DB80E.5040709@ncl.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20050519085035.GA4076@lascartasdelavida.com> <[🔎] uj8je.4579$eR.4033@fe05.lga> <[🔎] 428D6846.20600@rfgt.net> <[🔎] 428DB80E.5040709@ncl.ac.uk>

Jon Dowland wrote:

Robert Vangel wrote:
DesScorp wrote:
Use the standalone Mozilla browser (not firefox).
Say what now?
Seconded. Neither was usable for me on such a machine.

I guess that depends on your definition of usable. I run them both andKDE and OpenOffice on a K6-2 350. OTOH I have compiled programs frompaper tape in the distant past.


Paul Scott

Reply to:

References:
- is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Nacho <listasdecorreo@lascartasdelavida.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: DesScorp <DesScorp@gmail.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Robert Vangel <vangelr@rfgt.net>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Jon Dowland <jon-dowland@ncl.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Smooth upgrade from testing to unstable
Next by Date: Re: Smooth upgrade from testing to unstable
Previous by thread: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
Next by thread: project accounting application in Debian?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread