Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?

To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
From: Jon Dowland <jon-dowland@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:12:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 428DB80E.5040709@ncl.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 428D6846.20600@rfgt.net>
References: <[🔎] 20050519085035.GA4076@lascartasdelavida.com> <[🔎] uj8je.4579$eR.4033@fe05.lga> <[🔎] 428D6846.20600@rfgt.net>

Robert Vangel wrote:

DesScorp wrote:

Use the standalone Mozilla browser (not firefox).


Say what now?

Seconded. Neither was usable for me on such a machine.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Nacho <listasdecorreo@lascartasdelavida.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com>

References:
- is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Nacho <listasdecorreo@lascartasdelavida.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: DesScorp <DesScorp@gmail.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Robert Vangel <vangelr@rfgt.net>

Prev by Date: apt-get and synaptic error
Next by Date: boot problems
Previous by thread: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
Next by thread: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread