Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
From: Robert Vangel <vangelr@rfgt.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:32:06 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 428D6846.20600@rfgt.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] uj8je.4579$eR.4033@fe05.lga>
References: <[🔎] 20050519085035.GA4076@lascartasdelavida.com> <[🔎] uj8je.4579$eR.4033@fe05.lga>

DesScorp wrote:

Use the standalone Mozilla browser (not firefox).


Say what now?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Jon Dowland <jon-dowland@ncl.ac.uk>

References:
- is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: Nacho <listasdecorreo@lascartasdelavida.com>
- Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
  - From: DesScorp <DesScorp@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: substitute for ping
Next by Date: which is the module for CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
Previous by thread: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
Next by thread: Re: is Sarge much slower than Woody on old hardware?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread