[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: why I don't want CCs



also sprach Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> [2003.07.17.1739 +0200]:
> Whereas my switching from Mutt to a GUI application raised mine by
> factors because I didn't have to deal with the trouble of
> configuring it to my required setup.  Also you missed the point.
> Even if I weren't writing a message I could see what is where and
> how much.  I don't have to explicitly check it every time.

The UNIX philosophy says: xbuffy!

> > Aside, xbuffy can do it all for you if you wish.
> 
>     Free blindness included.  Uh, no, it doesn't.

Like what does it not do?

> > And I save 25 Mb of RAM and am way faster than you.
> 
>     Are you now?  How can you be sure?

Because sylpheed is a memory hog and mutt+xbuffy isn't.

-- 
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: pgpgGbB3oncJX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: