debian-policy Dec 2017 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[developers-reference] 01/01: Don't recommend to use "if [ -x /usr/bin/<cmd> ]; …" in maintainer scripts
[developers-reference] branch devref-vs-#769845 created (now 5c152e0)
Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main
Re: Bug #882628: base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences
Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling
Bug#515856: [debhelper-devel] Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source
Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source
Bug#522163: marked as done (standard for disabling daemons in /etc/default)
Bug#601455: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds
Bug#601455: marked as done (Standardize how to disable an init script)
Bug#601455: Steps towards a patch to document disabling a daemon upon installation
Bug#614807: debian-policy: Please document autobuilder-imposed build-dependency alternative restrictions
Bug#661496: marked as done (Standardize how to disable an init script)
Bug#682347: mark 'editor' virtual package name as obsolete
Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive
Bug#688251: Built-Using description too aggressive
Bug#688251: marked as done (Built-Using description too aggressive)
Bug#742364: Patch to document debian/missing-sources
Bug#786470: debian-policy: [copyright-format] Add an optional “License-Grant” field
Bug#810381: debian-policy: Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to reflect the need for security
Bug#810381: marked as done (Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to recommend encryption)
Bug#859649: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses
Bug#859649: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenseso
Bug#859649: marked as done (debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses)
Bug#873456: debian-policy: missing anchor: document-index
Bug#874090: debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages
Bug#874090: marked as done (debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages)
Bug#874095: copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition
Bug#874095: marked as done (copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition)
Bug#876075: Anchors are non-unique in the single-HTML version
Bug#876241: debian-policy: Produce HTML output that doesn't try to load any JavaScript
Re: Bug#877337: www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual
Bug#879048: debian-policy: footnote links pointing to wrong location
Bug#880920: Document Rules-Requires-Root field
Bug#880992: debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path
Bug#880992: marked as done (debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path)
Bug#882628: marked as done (base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences)
Bug#883233: First footnote to section 7.1 should say which of Debian's autobuilders ignore alternative dependencies
Bug#883742: developers-reference: §6.4: Please don't recommend to use "if [ -x /usr/bin/<command> ]; …" in maintainer scripts
Bug#883950: [INPUT REQUIRED] Re: Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier
Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier
Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifiero
Bug#883950: Next steps on "[GPL-3+]" proposal
Bug#883966: debian-policy: please add MIT/Expat to common licenses
Bug#883968: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-SA-3.0 to common licenses
Bug#883969: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-SA-4.0 to common licenses
Bug#884006: copyright-format: Documenting copyrights not in source package but in binary package
Bug#884223: debian-policy: please add AGPL-3.0 to common licenses
Bug#884224: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses
Bug#884224: ebian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses
Bug#884225: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-4.0 to common licenses
Bug#884226: debian-policy: please add EPL-1.0 to common licenses
Bug#884227: debian-policy: please add zlib to common licenses
Bug#884228: debian-policy: please add OFL-1.1 to common licenses
Bug#884857: developers-reference: clarify process on retirement/improve wording
Bug#884964: Bug#875958: sa-compile: The package fails to run sa-compile
Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail
Bug#885219: /lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc
Bug#885219: marked as done (/lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc)
Bug#885698: Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses
Re: Debian Policy 4.1.0.0 released
debian-policy_4.1.3.0_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Re: environment for maintainer scripts
FYI: policy git repository moved to salsa.debian.org
Processed (with 1 error): user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy ...
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail
Processed: forcibly merging 795402 883968
Processed: forcibly merging 795402 883969
Processed: forcibly merging 859649 882628
Processed: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds
Processed: Patch to document debian/missing-sources
Processed: Re: [Debconf-devel] Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail
Processed: Re: [INPUT REQUIRED] debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier
Processed: Re: Bug #882628: base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences
Processed: Re: Bug#515856: [debhelper-devel] Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source
Processed: Re: Bug#688251: Built-Using description too aggressive
Processed: Re: Bug#810381: debian-policy: Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to reflect the need for security
Processed: Re: Bug#874090: debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages
Processed: Re: Bug#874095: copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition
Processed: Re: Bug#880992: debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path
Processed: Re: Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier
Processed: Re: Bug#884006: copyright-format: Documenting copyrights not in source package but in binary package
Processed: Re: Bug#884224: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses
Processed: Re: Bug#885219: /lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc
Processed: Re: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses
Processed: Re: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds
Processed: restore blocks that were removed by merge
Processed: tagging 666056, block 666056 with 459427
Processed: tagging 671544, block 671544 with 459427
Processed: tagging 671544, unblock 671544 with 459427
Processed: Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses
Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy ...
Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, tagging 859649
Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 885219 ...
Processing of debian-policy_4.1.3.0_multi.changes
Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta
Re: Which files should go in ‘/usr/share/common-licenses/’?
The last update was on 09:10 GMT Fri Jun 07. There are 259 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc