debian-policy Dec 2017 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
[developers-reference] 01/01: Don't recommend to use "if [ -x /usr/bin/<cmd> ]; …" in maintainer scripts [developers-reference] branch devref-vs-#769845 created (now 5c152e0) Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main Re: Bug #882628: base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling Bug#515856: [debhelper-devel] Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source Bug#522163: marked as done (standard for disabling daemons in /etc/default) Bug#601455: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds Bug#601455: marked as done (Standardize how to disable an init script) Bug#601455: Steps towards a patch to document disabling a daemon upon installation Bug#614807: debian-policy: Please document autobuilder-imposed build-dependency alternative restrictions Bug#661496: marked as done (Standardize how to disable an init script) Bug#682347: mark 'editor' virtual package name as obsolete Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive Bug#688251: Built-Using description too aggressive Bug#688251: marked as done (Built-Using description too aggressive) Bug#742364: Patch to document debian/missing-sources Bug#786470: debian-policy: [copyright-format] Add an optional “License-Grant” field Bug#810381: debian-policy: Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to reflect the need for security Bug#810381: marked as done (Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to recommend encryption) Bug#859649: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses Bug#859649: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenseso Bug#859649: marked as done (debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses) Bug#873456: debian-policy: missing anchor: document-index Bug#874090: debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages Bug#874090: marked as done (debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages) Bug#874095: copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition Bug#874095: marked as done (copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition) Bug#876075: Anchors are non-unique in the single-HTML version Bug#876241: debian-policy: Produce HTML output that doesn't try to load any JavaScript Re: Bug#877337: www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual Bug#879048: debian-policy: footnote links pointing to wrong location Bug#880920: Document Rules-Requires-Root field Bug#880992: debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path Bug#880992: marked as done (debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path) Bug#882628: marked as done (base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences) Bug#883233: First footnote to section 7.1 should say which of Debian's autobuilders ignore alternative dependencies Bug#883742: developers-reference: §6.4: Please don't recommend to use "if [ -x /usr/bin/<command> ]; …" in maintainer scripts Bug#883950: [INPUT REQUIRED] Re: Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifiero Bug#883950: Next steps on "[GPL-3+]" proposal Bug#883966: debian-policy: please add MIT/Expat to common licenses Bug#883968: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-SA-3.0 to common licenses Bug#883969: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-SA-4.0 to common licenses Bug#884006: copyright-format: Documenting copyrights not in source package but in binary package Bug#884223: debian-policy: please add AGPL-3.0 to common licenses Bug#884224: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses Bug#884224: ebian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses Bug#884225: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-4.0 to common licenses Bug#884226: debian-policy: please add EPL-1.0 to common licenses Bug#884227: debian-policy: please add zlib to common licenses Bug#884228: debian-policy: please add OFL-1.1 to common licenses Bug#884857: developers-reference: clarify process on retirement/improve wording Bug#884964: Bug#875958: sa-compile: The package fails to run sa-compile Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail Bug#885219: /lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc Bug#885219: marked as done (/lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc) Bug#885698: Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses Re: Debian Policy 4.1.0.0 released debian-policy_4.1.3.0_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Re: environment for maintainer scripts FYI: policy git repository moved to salsa.debian.org Processed (with 1 error): user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy ... Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail Processed: forcibly merging 795402 883968 Processed: forcibly merging 795402 883969 Processed: forcibly merging 859649 882628 Processed: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds Processed: Patch to document debian/missing-sources Processed: Re: [Debconf-devel] Bug#884964: using "su - " in postinst causing some installs to fail Processed: Re: [INPUT REQUIRED] debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier Processed: Re: Bug #882628: base-files: Please ship CC0 in /usr/share/common-licences Processed: Re: Bug#515856: [debhelper-devel] Bug#515856: debhelper: please implement dh get-orig-source Processed: Re: Bug#688251: Built-Using description too aggressive Processed: Re: Bug#810381: debian-policy: Update wording of 5.6.26 VCS-* fields to reflect the need for security Processed: Re: Bug#874090: debian-policy: Clarify wording of some passages Processed: Re: Bug#874095: copyright-format: Use the “synopsis” term established in the definition Processed: Re: Bug#880992: debian-policy should not recommend running editor using absolute path Processed: Re: Bug#883950: debian-policy: allow specifying common licenses with only the identifier Processed: Re: Bug#884006: copyright-format: Documenting copyrights not in source package but in binary package Processed: Re: Bug#884224: debian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses Processed: Re: Bug#885219: /lib64 provision added in 9.1.1 prohibits multilib libc Processed: Re: debian-policy: Please add CC0-1.0 to common-licenses Processed: Re: Full patch for this bug -- seeking seconds Processed: restore blocks that were removed by merge Processed: tagging 666056, block 666056 with 459427 Processed: tagging 671544, block 671544 with 459427 Processed: tagging 671544, unblock 671544 with 459427 Processed: Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy ... Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, tagging 859649 Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 885219 ... Processing of debian-policy_4.1.3.0_multi.changes Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta Re: Which files should go in ‘/usr/share/common-licenses/’? The last update was on 09:10 GMT Fri Jun 07. There are 259 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc