[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601455: Steps towards a patch to document disabling a daemon upon installation



Hello Andreas,

On Sun, Sep 10 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote:

> I can't help myself but repeat that I'd prefer seeing more passive
> wording eg. instead of "instead add to your postinst" use something
> like "the postinst should contain" + a footnote about this normally
> being added by dh_...  Manually written maintainer scripts should be
> avoided and I've seen people being "fooled" by taking policy literally
> before.

This would be a non-normative change to Policy so it should be a
separate bug.  For this bug, let's stick with the wording that's
consistent with what's already there -- i.e. the patch for this bug
should not add "the postinst should contain" when just above we already
have "put in your postinst".

I agree with you, so please consider filing this bug.

> (Maybe this deserves a section of its own?)

I think we would be fine just to continue to sprinkle nudges towards
debhelper tools at the relevant points in the Policy Manual.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: