[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#884006: copyright-format: Documenting copyrights not in source package but in binary package



Dear Yao,

On Tue, Dec 12 2017, Yao Wei wrote:

> Built-Using doesn't contain copyright notice and license info, for
> example Expat has the following clause:
>
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

Okay, I see what you're saying.

We don't add new fields to Policy until they see use in the archive (for
example, in #786470 we are discussing adding License-Grant: because it
is already being used in some packages).  So this bug should wait until
at least a handful of packages are using the field.

But secondly, you are surely not the first person to come across this
issue.  We need to determine how this has been handled before, and
whether the ftp-masters have even permitted packages with the situation
you describe into the archive.

I'll leave this bug tagged moreinfo until the above are determined.  Per
the Policy Changes Process the bug may be closed if the info is not
forthcoming in 30 days; don't be discouraged by this, because you can
always file a new bug when

- we have figured out what the best practice actually is here
- some packages are using that best practice.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: