Hello, On Fri, Dec 29 2017, Bill Allombert wrote: > This is debatable. You might underestimate the challenge involved in > building some "upstream" tarballs. Sure, I might be, but I'd really like to see an example of one of these packages. We can't hold back removing cruft from the Policy merely because there /might/ be a case where the cruft is the only way to do something. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature