Bug#883233: First footnote to section 7.1 should say which of Debian's autobuilders ignore alternative dependencies
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> wanna-build team / Release Team / Backports Team: exactly which buildds
> ignore alternative dependencies? We want to include this in an
> (existing) Policy footnote.
Good idea.
For porter uploads, some people (including me) use cowbuilder,
which uses aptitude, a “classic” hand-grown algorithm, or (in
very recent distributions) apt for dependency resolution, and
thus does consider alternative dependencies.
Others use sbuild, which may or may not, as the buildds also
use sbuild.
Not exactly a buildd, but for completeness sake…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database” ‣‣‣ Please, http://deb.li/mysql and MariaDB, finally die!
Reply to: