debian-policy Sep 2001 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Adam Di Carlo

Bug#112090: fw: Bug#112090: [PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time] Sep 17
Bug#112090: [fw: Bug#112090: [PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time] Sep 16

Adam Heath

Re: Large-scale java policy violations Sep 15

Andrew Suffield

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 03
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13

Anthony Giorgio

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 19

Anthony Towns

Bug#48045: normal and non-US names Sep 20
Bug#48045: normal and non-US names Sep 20

Ben Burton

Re: Large-scale java policy violations Sep 15

Branden Robinson

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 10
marking 111025 as an amendment Sep 11

Brian Elias

Hello Sep 08

Brian May

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04
Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Sep 06
Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Sep 06

Chris Waters

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05

Colin Watson

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 20
Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts Sep 20

David Coe

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 02

David Kimdon

Bug#112090: [PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 12
Bug#111839: PROPOSAL]: packages should be cross buildable Sep 10
Bug#111839: [PROPOSAL]: packages should be cross buildable Sep 10
Bug#111839: PROPOSAL]: packages should be cross buildable Sep 10
Bug#112090: fw: Bug#112090: [PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time] Sep 17
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 12

Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#106280: Bug#111088: Info received (was Bug#111088: postinst creates device nodes without permission, policy violation) Sep 04
Processed: Forgot to send this to control Sep 20
Bug#106280: Info received (was Bug#106280: Bug#111088: postinst creates device nodes without permission, policy violation) Sep 04
Processed: Re: Bug#113525: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug example in policy is unhelpful Sep 25
Processed: marking 111025 as an amendment Sep 11
Processed: bah, senility strikes again Sep 11
Processed: Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05

Eduard Bloch

Bug#106280: Bug#111088: postinst creates device nodes without permission, policy violation Sep 04

Gerhard Tonn

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 19

Glenn McGrath

Bug#48045: normal and non-US names Sep 20
Bug#48045: normal and non-US names Sep 20

HelptheHungry

Hits Against Hunger now Help the Hungry Sep 04

Herbert Xu

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 03
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 10

Ian Zimmerman

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 22
frontends [Was: debconf dilemma] Sep 04
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02

Jakob B. Jensen

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 06
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 01

jcdubacq

Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 10

Joey Hess

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 03
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13

Josip Rodin

Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05
Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05
Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 10

Julian Gilbey

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 02
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 06
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 10
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 02

Manoj Srivastava

Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05

Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02

Marcus Brinkmann

Bug#111839: PROPOSAL]: packages should be cross buildable Sep 10

Mark Brown

Bug#106280: Packages not needing to ask about calling MAKEDEV Sep 04
Bug#106280: Bug#111088: postinst creates device nodes without permission, policy violation Sep 04

Raul Miller

Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Sep 05
Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default Sep 06

Richard Braakman

Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13

Rick Troth

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 19

Robert McQueen

Bug#111137: minor semantic confusion in 13.6/13.8 pertaining to symlinked doc dirs Sep 04

Roland Mas

Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05

Santiago Vila

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 02
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 01
Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 02
Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05

Scott Dier

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 02
debconf dilemma Sep 02
Bug#111839: PROPOSAL]: packages should be cross buildable Sep 10

Scott M. Dier

Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04
Re: debconf dilemma Sep 04

Stefan Hornburg Racke

Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts Sep 19

Steve Greenland

Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time] Sep 17
Re: Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL Sep 01
Bug#48045: normal and non-US names Sep 20
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 06
Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts Sep 20

Steve Kowalik

Re: Large-scale java policy violations Sep 16
Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 10

Steve M . Robbins

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 03

Steve M. Robbins

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05
Re: versioned shlibs file -- when and why Sep 03
Re: Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 12
[AMENDMENT 2001-09-10] correcting ldconfig policy in Chapter 9 Sep 12
Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 08

Tille, Andreas

Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 10
Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05
Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package Sep 05

Vociferous Mole

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts Sep 05

Wichert Akkerman

Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13
Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 19
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 12
[agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary] Sep 19
Bug#112090: PROPOSAL]: support reduced footprint debs at build time Sep 13

The last update was on 08:11 GMT Sat May 04. There are 117 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc