Re: Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Well, I´m not familiear with policy decisions. However if I´m not
> completely wrong the MPL seems to be what I would call a *common
> license* if I look at several projects releasing under it. That´s
> why I expected that we would have more packages which are released
> under MPL.
>
> I have no personal feelings about it and if you think this is no
> reason to include it in the common licenses dir feel free to close
> this bug.
Furthermore, the "GPL should be included in any package under GPL anyway
because of distribution of .deb on non-Debian systems" debate should
have shown that putting a license in common-licenses is a bad idea.
--
Jean-Christophe Dubacq -- ATER en informatique à la faculté d'Orsay.
Tel: 01 69 15 76 43 / 06 64 86 10 56 --- Email: jcdubacq@lri.fr
Reply to: