On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:58:11 +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> > - Should we rename also the git repo? I tend to "yes", since it the
> > moment the (repo and therefore the) local directory is called after
> > the old package name, which means I'll never find it again :)
> > and `dpt co libtime-parsedate-perl' also doesn't work.
> I had indeed wondered the same thing! What would be the process for
> renaming the git repo.. Is it a rename of do we create a new repo with
> dpt alioth-repo?
I think mv'ing the directory on alioth and updating the name in our
.mrconfig should be enough.
This will leave the old repo checked out on our own machines but I
think we have no machinery for this ... Or is there something in dpt
to find repos that are not in .mrconfig? Or have I just used a shell
one-liner posted by someone in the past?
> > - For the dummy package you added
> > Depends: libtime-parsedate-perl (= ${binary:Version})
> > I think a plain "Depends: libtime-parsedate-perl" would be enough,
> > after all we only want to pull in the new package.
> > But I might miss something here; in this case we also should
> > revisit other dummy packages.
> That's fine... I was just using what I'd seen done in other packages.
That's an interesting aspect, I don't think I've ever seen such a
pull-me-in dependency versioned :)
> Also once uploaded I guess we need to file bugs/update the following
> packages which rdepend on libtime-modules-perl
> request-tracker4
> mon
> lire
> libschedule-cron-perl
> dirvish
> backuppc
Oh, yes, good point!
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Cat Stevens: Baby Get Your Head Screwed On
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature