On 28/05/14 08:21, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| gregor herrmann, 28.05.2014 08:52:40 +0200 |=- >> On Wed, 28 May 2014 09:23:41 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> >>>> I don't see the difference to b). :-) >>> Perhaps I just misunderstood the original proposal as: >>> >>> * start src:libtime-parsedate-perl all anew producing a new binary >>> package with the same name >>> * keep src:libtime-modules-perl, but only produce a hollow >>> libtime-modules-perl binary package, depending on >>> libtime-parsedate-perl >> >> My preference ist to >> - take the existing packaging but >> - rename the source package (and produce a new binary and make >> the old one a transitional dummy package), else someone (at least >> me :)) will be confused in the future > > Yes, exactly. > > Apologies if there was some confusion... that was probably down to my wording! But you've all confirmed what I thought would be the correct approach :) -- Daniel Lintott GPG Key: 4096R/5D73EC6E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature