-=| Axel Beckert, 27.05.2014 23:07:03 +0200 |=- > Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > I can see two options for updating the package: > > > a) Keep the same in Debian (doesn't seem user friendly) > > > b) We start again by packaging the new upstream version and providing > > > a transitional package which depends on the new package. > > > > certainly b). > > Seconded. > > > Or perhaps a light version of it, where only the source/binary > > package is renamed and a dummy transitional binary package named > > libtime-modules-perl is kept until Jessie is released. > > I don't see the difference to b). :-) Perhaps I just misunderstood the original proposal as: * start src:libtime-parsedate-perl all anew producing a new binary package with the same name * keep src:libtime-modules-perl, but only produce a hollow libtime-modules-perl binary package, depending on libtime-parsedate-perl Again, perhaps this is not what Daniel meant, so sorry for the confusion.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature