Re: negative vote for maintainer Michael Gilbert
Hi Sergiusz,
Il giorno mer, 04/01/2012 alle 17.36 +0000, Sergiusz Pawlowicz ha
scritto:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 17:29, Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:24:14PM +0000, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> >> And this is why not all take their commitment seriously. In my world,
> >> I would give up, if I have no time.
> >
> > That would be ideal, but unfortunately a GR[0] reinforced that
> > good packaging work isn't actually valued.
> >
> > [0] http://www.debian.org/vote/2010/vote_002
>
> I am very sad seeing that.
I'm wondering why...
> In my world, any package which has a serious bug for more then 90
> days, should be stripped of maintainers and moved to list of packages
> waiting for an adoption.
>
> And I do not want to argue, it is my world, and I keep my world
> running. You can have, guys, your own worlds, but please allow me to
> have my say.
You are writing on a ML it is natural to argue on POVs, I think that in
such place the only thing to respect is "to be constructive" in a
discussion.
I'm very proud to have become a DD after a long time of life troubles
that have caused a long stop of all my work on debian, I haven't
"abbandoned" any of my packages, just because others peoples helped me
with patches and suggestion on how to solve issues. Luckily no one
asked me to go away from the project.
I think that such type of cooperation can help the project. I think that
is sad to read an email like "negative vote for xxx" without any
proposal to help. IMHO a criticism like this is useless, try to help
instead.
francesco
--
.''`. Francesco Namuri
: :' : http://namuri.it/
`. `' key ID = 187B2D8E
`- fingerprint = C0F7 9593 F613 C75A EC0A DFBF 56E2 F903 187B 2D8E
Reply to: