Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package

[Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>]

Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl> writes:

> Doc packages are usually called package-doc.  I see no reason to change
> that here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense.  Removing
> "lib" would just confuse the name, because it would be less clear which
> package the doc is for.

I prefer -tutorial to -doc in this particular case, since otherwise when
browsing the package list I'd think I'd have to install the -doc package
to get any documentation at all (rather than just a separate tutorial).

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>