Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I buy Sven's arguments in favor of adding -nonfree. I would also strip the
> "lib" at the beginning of the name. The upstream Perl module is called
> Parse-RecDescent, so I would call the package parse-recdescent-doc-nonfree.
> What do you think?
Stick to the perl package naming convention. Please.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: