Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package
* Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl> [2005-09-15 17:56]:
> Doc packages are usually called package-doc. I see no reason to change that
> here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense. Removing "lib" would
> just confuse the name, because it would be less clear which package the doc is
> for.
>
> > At any rate, I guess you are suggesting the name
> > libparse-recdescent-perl-doc-nonfree, aren't you?
>
> That's what I'd suggest.
These are good arguments. Thanks, I will call the package like that.
--
Rafael
Reply to: