Rafael Laboissiere wrote on 15/09/2005 13:15: > [Please Cc: replies to me.] > My package libparse-recdescent-perl contains a tutorial in HTML which is > non DFSG-compliant and I have to remove it from the main package. The > tutorial is actually quite helpful and I would like to make a nonfree > package for it. > > My questions are: > 1) Do I have to create a separate source package for the nonfree binary > package? Since the non-free documentation needs to be removed from the source package in main, obviously yes, you need to create a second source package. > 2) How should the nonfree package be called? The options would be: > > libparse-recdescent-perl-nonfree > libparse-recdescent-perl-doc > parse-recdescent-doc > parse-recdescent-nonfree > parse-recdescent-doc-nonfree > parse-recdescent-nonfree-doc > > or variations of the above. Since the original package is libparse-recdescent-perl, I would name the non-free package libparse-recdescent-tutorial (if it really only includes a tutorial) or libparse-recdescent-doc-nonfree (if it is more than just the tutorial). In the latter case, I appended -nonfree to not block the -doc package name once free documentation becomes available. cu, sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature